Preview

IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY

Advanced search

Study of biomorphological features of Phlox paniculata L. varieties from the collection of Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-1-43-63

Abstract

The article presents the results of research on the study of biomorphological features of Phlox paniculata L. varieties from the collection of the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy for the most important ornamental and economically valuable features. A methodology was developed and carried out to assess the ornamental features of some Ph. paniculata varieties to obtain breeding material promising for use in urban landscaping, as well as agro-industrial facilities and private gardening. Ornamental and economically valuable traits were considered according to the approved methodology for testing varieties for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability for two years. The tallest plants in the collection are the Zemlyanichnoe Sufle and Miss Olga varieties (on average, 70.0 cm). The most frequent leaf is green (34 varieties). The greatest length of the leaf blade was noted in the Junior Abundance and Casablanca varieties (on average 13.0 cm), the width – in the Berendey and Flamenco varieties (4.3 cm). The maximum flower diameter was found in the Faina Ranevskaya and Younique Mouve varieties (5.2 cm), inflorescence diameter – in the Flamenco variety (20.8 cm). The most frequent inflorescence shape in the studied varieties is rounded-conical (13 varieties). As a result of the assessment of the main morphological features, domestic and foreign varieties of Ph. paniculata varieties promising for breeding and producing high-quality floral products were identified: Zemlyanichnoe Sufle, Miss Olga, Knyaz Ryurik, Flamenco, Faina Ranevskaya, Chaika, Spatsommer, White Sparr, Dusterlohe, Casablanca, Darwin’s Joyce, Younique Mouve. The most ornamental variety is Darwin’s Joyce (64–75 points) characterized by a dense and compact bush, a rather strong and ornamental inflorescence consisting of large flowers of uniform, non-fading color. The possibility of using some varieties for cutting was considered.

About the Authors

E. E. Orlova
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Elena E. Orlova, CSc (Agr), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya st., Moscow, 127550



I. N. Zubik
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Inna N. Zubik, CSc (Agr), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya st., Moscow, 127550



E. E. Kozlova
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Elena E. Kozlova, CSc (Agr), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya st., Moscow, 127550



References

1. Vysotsky V.A. The Role of Biotechnological Methods in the Introduction, Reproduction, Breeding and Preservation of the Gene Pool of Rare and Unconventional Plants. New and Unconventional Plants and Prospects for Its Use. 2015;11:27-29. (In Russ.) EDN: UQHMZT.

2. The State Commission of the Russian Federation for Testing and Protection of Breeding Achievements: official website. https://gossortrf.ru/registry/ (In Russ.)

3. Zubik I.N., Orlova E.E., Kozlova E.A, et al. Phenological Features of Rose Varieties When Grown in Protected Soil Conditions. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2024;1:17-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2024-1-17-29.

4. Kovaleva I.S., Matsneva A.E., Khanbabaeva O.E., Mazaeva A.S. Assessment of the Effect of Phlox paniculata L. Bulletin of the Kursk State Academy. 2018;9:108-110. (In Russ.) EDN: TPRTYH.

5. Makarov S.S., Feklistov P.A., Kuznetsova I.B., et al. Technologies of Reproduction and Creation of Species and Varieties of Blueberry for the Creation of a Bioresource Collection. The State of Science and Technology of the Agroindustrial Complex. 2023:37(12):11-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2023_37_12_11.

6. Makarov S.S., Chudetsky A.I., Sakhonenko A.N., et al. Creation of a Bioresource Collection of Berry Plants Based on Russian Timirazev State Agrarian University. Timiryazev Biological Journal. 2023;4:23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2949-4710-2023-4-23-33.

7. Pishcheva G.N. Genetic Features of Primary Phlox paniculata L. Specimens. in In Vitro Culture. The State of Science and Technology of the Agroindustrial Complex. 2016;30(9):40-43. (In Russ.) EDN: WWRGPH.

8. Certificate of State Registration of the Database No. 2023624731 (Russian Federation). Bioresourse Collection of Genus Ribes (Black Currant) / S.S. Makarov, A.I. Chudetsky, A.E. Makhneva et al., 2023. (In Russ.) EDN: XOJGWC.

9. Certificate of State Registration of the Database No. 2024620767 (Russian Federation). Collection of the Genus Hosta on the territory of Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy / Е.А. Козлова, Е.Е. Орлова, И.Н. Зубик, 2024. (In Russ.) EDN: RMQDEO.

10. Certificate of State Registration of the Database No. 2024624294 (Russian Federation). Bioresourse Collection of Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) of the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy / S.S. Makarov, A.I. Chudetsky, 2024. (In Russ.) EDN: DFUNJJ.

11. Certificate of State registration of the database No. 2024624555 (Russian Federation). Bioresourse Collection of Blueberry (Vaccinium) of the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy / S.S. Makarov, A.I. Chudetsky, I.N. Zubik, 2024. (In Russ.) EDN: PWWGOL.

12. Certificate of State registration of the database No. 2024624578 (Russian Federation). Bioresourse Collection of Arctic Bramble (Rubus arcticus L.) of the Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy / A.I. Chudetsky, S.S. Makarov, 2024. (In Russ.) EDN: PEVTZS.

13. Sokolkina A.I., Khanbabayeva O.E., Bondorina I.A., et al. Assessment of the Collection of Russian Varieties of Phlox paniculata L. in Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden by Morphological Characteristics. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2022;5:35-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342Х-2022-5-35-45.

14. Shpigina M.A., Artyukhova A.V. Vegetative Methods of Reproduction of Phlox paniculata. Pomiculture and Berry Growing in Russia. 2014;39:205-207. (In Russ.) EDN: SCXYLV.

15. Stepanov N.V. About New Forms of Phlox paniculata (Polemoniaceae). Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2021;5:74-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-5-74-80.

16. Stepanov N.V. New Large-flowered Forms of Phlox paniculata (Polemoniaceae). Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2023;9:25-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2023-9-25-32.

17. Khlestkina E.K. Genetic Resources of Russia: from Collections to Bioresource Centers. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 2022;181:9-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2022-1-9-30.

18. Shumikhin S.A., Chertkova M.A., Aksenova L.V. Changes in the Size of Phlox paniculata L. in the Perm Region. Bulletin of Perm University. Series of Biology. 2020;2:103-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9952-2020-2-103-108.

19. Andreeva E., Burlakovskiy M., Buzovkina I., et al. Genetic Collections of St. Petersburg University. Bio. Comm. 2023;68(3):199–214. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2023.308.

20. Butenkova A.N., Belaeva T.N., Shmakova G.A Physiological Response of Phlox paniculata L. Varieties to Different Growing Conditions of Western Siberia. E3S Web of Conferences. 2024;486:07005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448607005.

21. Kulyan R., Pashchenko O., Omarova Z., Slepchenko N. Replenishment of the Bioresource Collection of the Subtropical Scientific Centre with Varieties of Own Selection. E3S Web of Conferences. 2024;539:01018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453901018

22. Ryndin A., Gutiyeva N., Pashchenko O., Slepchenko N. Bioresource Collection of Flower Crops in FRC SSC of RAS and Its Use in Breeding Research. BIO Web of Conferences. 2022;47:02009. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224702009.

23. Stepantsova N.V., Chepinoga V.V., Kazanovskiy S.G., et al. Floristic Findings on the Territory of Baikal Siberia. Turczaninowia. 2022;25(3):194-206. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.25.3.18.

24. Vejsadová H., Matiska P., Obert B., et al. Somatic Embryogenesis in Phlox paniculata – Histological Analysis. Biologia. 2016;71(7):763-768. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0100.


Review

For citations:


Orlova E.E., Zubik I.N., Kozlova E.E. Study of biomorphological features of Phlox paniculata L. varieties from the collection of Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2025;(1):43-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-1-43-63

Views: 83


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0021-342X (Print)