Preview

IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY

Advanced search

Resource assessment of the cenopopulations of Sanguisorba officinalis L. in the Surgut District of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra

https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-2-57-71

Abstract

Great burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal, melliferous and ornamental plant. Natural populations of this species are quite rare in some regions of Russia. The article presents an assessment of the current state of S. officinalis coenopopulations in the KhantyMansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, Russia. The age structure of S. officinalis coenopopulations was studied, and the biological and exploitable reserves of S. officinalis plant material in various plant communities of the Surgut District of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra were determined. S. officinalis coenopopulations mainly consist of young (39.8–95.8% of pregenerative) individuals, which can be explained by the confinement of this species to floodplains with their characteristic systematic flooding. The cereal-burnet willow floodplain and the willow-forb swampy floodplain are promising locations for collecting raw materials, as S. officinalis occupies a significant part of the herbaceous layer in these areas (with total projective cover of about 30% and 20%, respectively). The density of moderately and weakly self-sustaining plant populations is 6.5 and 10.4 pcs/m2 , respectively. On average, the biological raw material reserve is 41.12 kg and 73.66 kg; the operational reserve is 32.8 and 62.62 kg; the possible volume of raw material procurement is 2.98 and 5.69 kg. The specific raw material phytomass of the underground part of plants is 205.6 and 368.3 g/m2 . The predominance of young unstable populations of S. officinalis is observed, which limits the possibility of harvesting medicinal raw materials in the Surgut District.

About the Authors

S. S. Makarov
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Sergey S. Makarov, DSc (Ag), Head of the Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550



E. A. Berdysheva
Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Berdysheva, Master of Science, Department of Biology and Biotechnology

1 Lenina Av., Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, 628400



T. A. Makarova
Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Makarova, CSc (Bio), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Biology and Biotechnology

1 Lenina Av., Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, 628400



P. N. Makarov
Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Petr N. Makarov, CSc (Bio), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Biology and Biotechnology

1 Lenina Av., Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, 628400



Yu. S. Cheryatova
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Yulya S. Cheryatova, CSc (Biol), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550



A. I. Chudetsky
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Anton I. Chudetsky, CSc (Ag), Associate Professor at Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Turfgrass Science

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550



References

1. Makarov S.S., Bagaev E.S., Tsaregradskaya S.Yu., Kuznetsova I.B. Problems of use and reproduction of phytogenic food and medicinal forest resources on the forest fund lands of the Kostroma Region. Russian Forestry Journal. 2019;6:118-131 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2019-6-118

2. Cheryatova Yu.S. Biodiversity of medicinal plants as a central component of the health of the planet. Biosfernoe khozyaystvo: teoriya i praktika. 2023;9:58-62. (In Russ.)

3. Cheryatova Yu.S. On the problem of protection and reproduction of rare medicinal plant resources. Biosfernoe khozyaystvo: teoriya i praktika. 2024;3:46-50. (In Russ.)

4. Berdysheva E.A., Makarova T.A. Growing great burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis L.) under photoculture conditions. V Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem ‘Bezopasniy Sever – chistaya Arktika’. April 13-14, 2023. Surgut, Russia: Surgut State University, 2023; V:55-61. (In Russ.)

5. Kazeeva A.R., Petrova P.V., Pupykina K.A., Farkhutdinov R.R. Comparative estimation of antioxidant activity of great burnet rhizomes and herb. Meditsinskiy vestnik Bashkortostana. 2015;10(4):75-78. (In Russ.)

6. Makarov S.S., Makarova T.A., Berdysheva E.A. Methods for obtaining plant materials of medicinal burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis L.) in the conditions of the Taiga zone of Western Siberia: a monograph. Moscow, Russia: Kolos-s, 2023:72. (In Russ.)

7. Cheryatova Yu.S. Anatomy of medicinal and essential oil plants. Moscow, Russia: Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2015:133. (In Russ.)

8. Great Burnet Rhizomes and Roots (FS.2.5.0078.18). Approved by Order ofthe Ministry of Health ofRussia dated 31 October 2018 No. 749. In: State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. Ed.XIV, Vol. IV. Moscow, Russia: 2018. (In Russ.)

9. Konechnaya G.Yu., Suslova T.A. (Eds.) Red Data Book of the Vologda Region. Vol. 2: Plants and fungi. Vologda, Russia: Vologda State Pedagogical University, Rus, 2004:360. (In Russ.)

10. Isaev V.A. (Ed.) Red Data Book of the Ivanovo Region. Vol. 2: Plants and fungi. Ivanovo, Russia: PresSto. 2010:192. (In Russ.)

11. Sirotina M.V., Antsiferov A.L., Efimova A.A. (Eds.) Red Data Book of the Kostroma Region. 2nd ed. Kostroma, Russia: Kostroma State University, 2019:432. (In Russ.)

12. Akulov A.N. Phenolic compounds of the cell culture of the medicinal burnet Sanquisorba officinalis (L). Khimija rastitel’nogo syr’ja. 2019;1:241-250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2019014119

13. Budantsev A.L., Belenovskaya L.M., Bityukova N.V. Advances in the study ofthe component composition and biological activity of Sanguisorba officinalis(Rosaceae). Rastitelnye resursy. 2019;55(3):293-316. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0033994619030051 (In Russ.)

14. Tocai A.-C., Ranga F., Teodorescu A.G., Pallag A. et al. Evaluation of PolyphenolicComposition andAntimicrobial Properties of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and Sanguisorba minor Scop. Plants. 2022;11:3561. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243561

15. Valieva N.G. Medicinal plants – sources biologically active materials. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii veterinarnoy meditsiny imeni N.E. Baumana. 2010:44-48. (In Russ.)

16. Saparklycheva S.E., Chapalda T.L. Antimicrobial activity medicinal hemoptysis (Sanguisórbaofficinalis L.). Agrarnoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2020;2:10. (In Russ.)

17. Jang E., Inn K.-S., Jang Y.P., Lee K.-T. et al. Phytotherapeutic Activities of Sanguisorba officinalis and its Chemical Constituents: A Review. Am J Chin Med. 2018;46(2):299-318. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X18500155

18. Wang R., Sun J., Ye C., Wang J. et al. Chemical constituents isolated from the roots of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and their chemotaxonomic significance. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2019;89:103999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2019.103999

19. Heidari B., Saeedi M., Khanavi M. Phytochemistry and Biological Properties of Sanguisorba spp., an Updated Review. Res J Pharmacogn. 2024;11(3):87-105. https://doi.org/10.22127/RJP.2024.441696.2351

20. Makhanova G.S. Recommendations for the rational use and conservation of plant resources. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2016;4:120-121. (In Russ.)

21. Rabotnov T.A. Study of cenotic populations in order to clarify the “life strategy” of plant species. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series. 1975;80(2):5-7. (In Russ.)

22. Smirnova O.V., Toropova N.A. General concepts of population biology and plant ecology. In: Smirnova O.V. (Ed.). East European forests. History in the holocene and the present. Pt. 1. Moscow, Russia: Nauka. 2004;154-164. (In Russ.)

23. Silvertown J.W. Introduction to plant population ecology. Longman. 1982;4:18-24.

24. Sankov A.N., Shmygareva A.A. Resource science, ecology and protection of wild medicinal plants. Orenburg, Russia, 2013:91. (In Russ.)

25. Neronov V.V. Field practice in Geobotany in the Central Zone of European Russia. Moscow, Russia: Biodiversity Conservation Center, 2002:138. (In Russ.)

26. Zhukova L.A. Population life of meadow plants. Yoshkar-Ola, Russia: Lanar, 1995:224. (In Russ.)

27. Zhukova L.A. (Ed.) Ontogenetic atlas of medicinal plants. Yoshkar-Ola, Russia: Mari State University, 1997:240. (In Russ.)

28. Zhivotovsky L.A. Ontogenetic states, effective density and classification of plant populations. Ekologia. 2001;21:3-7. (In Russ.)

29. Uranov A.A. The age spectrum of cenopopulations as a function of time and energy wave processes. Biologicheskie nauki. 1975;2:7-34. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Makarov S.S., Berdysheva E.A., Makarova T.A., Makarov P.N., Cheryatova Yu.S., Chudetsky A.I. Resource assessment of the cenopopulations of Sanguisorba officinalis L. in the Surgut District of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2025;1(2):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-2-57-71

Views: 51


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0021-342X (Print)