Preview

IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY

Advanced search

Evaluation of the size of the private subsidiary farms based on groupings by area

https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2024-2-173-188

Abstract

The article analyzes the approaches of state statistical bodies to the construction of analytical groupings of private subsidiary farms by the total land area and the total sown area. Analytical groupings published according to the national agricultural censuses, as a rule, represent distribution series, where the characteristics of the selected groups are limited only by the number of farms, the volume of the phenomenon and its ratio to the total. In addition, the program for publishing the results of the agricultural microcensus does not provide for a regional section. In order to improve the quality of the summary, analysis and presentation of the data on private subsidiary farms, it is proposed to revise the intervals for a number of grouping indicators and to significantly expand the set of features characterizing analytical groups. On the basis of depersonalized primary data of the agricultural microcensus, the article shows the possibilities of analyzing the size, specialization and intensification of agricultural production of private subsidiary farms while conducting a complete summary of the signs of the observation program. The trends of decrease in the total number of private subsidiary farms and their land and sown area revealed according to the census data indicate a reduction in the size of agricultural production of the category of households of the population, which makes it possible to raise the question of the expediency of their continuous survey and the introduction of censorship, as it is done in some foreign countries. On the basis of the data of the sample survey of private farms and the microcensus of 2021, an estimation of the value of the gross agricultural production by groups of farms according to the size of the land area was given, and it was proposed to introduce a requirement of 1000 m2 of land area for the inclusion of private subsidiary farms in the list of respondents of agricultural censuses.

About the Authors

A. V. Ukolova
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Anna V. Ukolova - CSc (Econ), Associate Professor, Acting Head of the Department of Statistics and Cybernetics.

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550; phone: (499) 976–12–53



K. A. Kozlov
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Kirill A. Kozlov - Assistant at the Department of Statistics and Cybernetics.

49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127550; phone: (499) 976–12–53



References

1. Zinchenko A.P. Statistics: textbook for university students, training programs 080100.62 Economics and 080200.62 Management. Moscow, Russia: Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev, 2013:368. (In Russ.)

2. Zinchenko A.P. Formation of agriculture added value in the system of Russian national accounting. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (TAA). 2016;1:97–107. (In Russ.)

3. Zinchenko A.P. Private farm enterprises according to the results of All-Russian agricultural censuses. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (TAA). 2019;2:119–128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34677/0021-342X-2019-2-119-128

4. Results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census of 2006. Vol. 3. Land resources and their use. Moscow, Russia: IITs “Statistics of Russia”, 2008:312. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/tabl_t3.pdf (accessed: August 28, 2023)

5. Results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census of 2006. Vol. 4. Sown areas of agricultural crops and areas of perennial plantations and berry crops. Book 2. Structure of acreage. Groupings of census objects by the size of the acreage. Moscow, Russia: IITs “Statistics of Russia”, 2008:560. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/t4k2.pdf (accessed: August 28, 2023)

6. Results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census of 2006. Vol. 3. Land resources and their use. Moscow, Russia: IITs “Statistics of Russia”, 2008:307. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/VSXP_2016_T_3_web.pdf (accessed: August 28, 2023)

7. Results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census of 2006. Vol. 4. Sown areas of agricultural crops and areas of perennial plantations and berry crops. Book 2. Structure of acreage. Groupings of census objects by the size of the acreage. Moscow, Russia: IITs “Statistics of Russia”, 2008:560. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Tom4_kn2.pdf (accessed: August 28, 2023)

8. Kozlov K.A., Ukolova A.V. Analysis of structural shifts in agriculture based on the materials of agricultural censuses. Accounting in Agriculture. 2023;4:237–244. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33920/sel-11-2304-04

9. Kozlov K.A., Ukolova A.V. Methodical approach to the typification of personal subsidiary farms. Accounting in agriculture. 2023;7:435–446. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33920/sel-11-2307-05

10. Kozlov K.A., Ukolova A.V. Aproach to the presentation of data from specialized statistical observations on personal subsidiary farms. Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2023;10:81–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32651/2310-81

11. Main results of the agricultural micro-census of 2021: statistics digest. Moscow, Russia: IITs “Statistics of Russia”, 2022:420. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Census_agr_2021_final.pdf (accessed: October 07, 2023)

12. Agriculture in Russia. 2023: statistics digest. Moscow, Russia: Rosstat, 2023:103. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Sel_xoz-vo_2023.pdf (accessed: January 15, 2024)

13. Sergeev S.S. Application of the statistical method in agricultural and economic research. In: Results and prospects for the development of agricultural science in the USSR. Ed. by I.I. Sinyagin. Moscow, USSR: “Kolos”, 1969. (In Russ.)

14. Ukolova A.V., Uliankin A.E. Statistical analysis of the results of the 2017 agricultural census by types of farms in the USA. Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2023;1:109–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32651/231-109

15. Ukolova A.V. Typification of agricultural enterprises in Germany. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya, posvyashchennaya 175-letiyu K.A. Timiryazeva, Moscow, December 06–08, 2018. In: Doklady TSKhA. Moscow, Russia: Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev, 2019:291(4):344–349. (In Russ.)

16. Ukolova A.V., Dashieva B.Sh. Typology of subsidiary farms according to the 2016 All-Russian agricultural census. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2022;2(4(124)):162–172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2022.04.02.02017.20

17. 17 Census of Agriculture United States. Summary and State Data. Volume 1. Geographic Area Series. United States: 2019;51. [Electronic source] URL: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf (accessed: October 12, 2023)

18. Federal State Statistics Service: website. Moscow, 1999. (In Russ.) [Electronic source] URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru (accessed: December 15, 2023)


Review

For citations:


Ukolova A.V., Kozlov K.A. Evaluation of the size of the private subsidiary farms based on groupings by area. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2024;(2):173-188. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2024-2-173-188

Views: 126


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0021-342X (Print)