Importance of agrochemical support in the transition to a sustainable farming model
https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2023-3-25-39
Abstract
This work is devoted to studying the role of agrochemical support in the transition to a sustainable farming model, identifying promising areas of research within the framework of this concept. It has been established that agrochemical support plays a crucial role in ensuring global food security. The use of agrochemicals and pesticides has a significant effect on increasing crop yields, improving crop quality and protecting plants from pests and diseases. However, the intensification of agriculture in some cases leads to increased production losses, as well as anthropogenic pollution of the environment and food, which can lead to human diseases, including cancer, infertility, stillbirth, and nervous system problems. The use of agrochemicals and pesticides has a significant impact on increasing crop yields, improving crop quality and protecting crops from pests and diseases. However, agricultural intensification in some cases leads to increased production losses, as well as anthropogenic pollution of the environment and food, which can lead to human diseases, including cancer, infertility, stillbirths and nervous system problems. The analysis of scientific research has shown that in order to create a sustainable agriculture, it is necessary to pay more attention to the development and adoption of alternative farming methods: methods based on the maximum use of biological factors; technologies that ensure a deficit-free humus balance; varietal technologies that allow for the maximum realisation of the genetic potential of varieties; geospatial methods and equipment for the precision application of chemicals to ensure their effectiveness; the use of fertiliser additives (biostimulants, nitrification inhibitors, urease inhibitors) that increase their efficiency and reduce theirthe negative impact on the environment; innovative methods of fertilisation and plant protection that ensure the preservation of soils, environment, animals, as well as the human health and safety.
About the Authors
S. V. MitrofanovRussian Federation
Sergey V. Mitrofanov, CSc (Ag), Research Associate, the Institute of Agrarian Research
11, Pokrovskiy Ave., Moscow, 109028
phone: (958) 657–47–01
N. V. Orlova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Orlova, Head of the Department of Innovation Economy in Agriculture, the Institute of Agrarian Research
11, Pokrovskiy Ave., Moscow, 109028
phone: (903) 147–99–29
I. Yu. Bogdanchikov
Russian Federation
Il’ya Yu. Bogdanchikov, CSc (Eng), Associate Professor
1, Kostycheva Str., Ryazan, 390044
phone: (910) 645–12–24
M. E. Chaplygin
Russian Federation
Mikhail E. Chaplygin, CSc (Eng), Senior Research Associate
5, b.1, 1-iy Institutskiy Passage, Moscow, 109428
phone: (918) 989–21–84
A. A. Shevchuk
Russian Federation
Artem A. Shevchuk, Senior Lecturer, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics
15, Kazakova Str., Moscow, 105064
phone: (916) 856–19–96
References
1. The Global Population Will Soon Reach Eight Billion - What Then? URL: https:// www.un.org/ru/184344 (In Rus.)
2. Sychev V.G., Shafran S.A., Vinogradova S.B. Soil Fertility in Russia and Ways of Its Regulation. Agrokhimia. 2020; 6: 3-13. DOI: 10.31857/S0002188120060125 (In Rus.)
3. Ranganathan J., Waite R., Searchinger T., Hanson C. How to Sustainably Feed Ten Billion People by 2050. URL: https://www.wri.org/insights/how-sustainably-feed-10-billion-people-2050-21-charts
4. Czyżewski B., Matuszczak A., Muntean A. Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness. Agricultural Economics. 2019; 7: 299-306. URL: https://doi.org/10.17221/290/2018-AGRICECON
5. Nowak A., Krukowski A., Rozanska-Boczula M. Assessment of Sustainability in Agriculture of the European Union Countries. Agronomy. 2019; 9. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9120890
6. Ahmed Z., Ambinakudige S. Does land use change, waterlogging, and salinity impact on sustainability of agriculture and food security? Evidence from southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh. Environ Monit Assess. 2023; 195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10673-w
7. Rahman S. Bangladesh Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Social Issues. Bangladesh: Economic, Political and Social Issues. Nova Science Publishers, 2018: 1-25.
8. Bashev H. Agricultural Economics, Governance and Innovation in Bulgaria. Vol. 2. KSP Books. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356740174_Agricultural_Economics_Governance_and_Innovation_in_Bulgaria_Vol2
9. Bulut S., Gökalp Z. Agriculture and environment interaction. Current Trends in Natural Sciences. 2022; 11(21): 372-380. URL: https://doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i21.041
10. Gerritsen A. Territorial knowledge governance Pursuing sustainability in agriculture and food clusters. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2019: 196. URL: https://doi.org/10.18174/499274
11. Ol’khovaya G.V., Shamileva E.E. Sustainability of Agriculture as a Socio-Ecological and Economic System: The Regional Aspect. Ekonomika stroitel’stva i prirodopol’zovaniya. 2021; 3 (80): 64-77. DOI: 10.37279/2519-4453-2021-3-64-77 (In Rus.)
12. FAO, 2019. International Code of Conduct for the Sustainable Use and Management of Fertilizers. Rome. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/ca5253ru/CA5253RU.pdf (In Rus.)
13. Dzhuvelikyan Kh.A., Cherepukhina I.V. Modern Problems of Natural and Man-Made Environmental Pollution (Review). Zhivye i biokosnye sistemy. 2017; 22. URL: http://www.jbks.ru/archive/issue-22/article-8 (In Rus.)
14. Gordeev A.V. et al. Bioclimatic Potential of Russia: Theory and Practice. M.: T-vo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 2006: 512. (In Rus.)
15. Papaskiri T.V. Economic Justification of Land Management Projects in the System of Adaptive Landscape Farming Based on Automation. Aktual’nye problemy prirodoobustroystva, kadastra i zemlepol’zovaniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 95-letiyu fakul’teta zemleustroystva i kadastrov VGAU. 2016: 210-216. EDN: XQUFWX (In Rus.)
16. Gupta S.K., Gupta P., Yadav A.D., Gangwar N. Slow-Release Fertilizer: A Review. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2019; 3; 8: 647-658.
17. Liu T. et al. The use of biological fertilizers in improving crop yield and quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2019; 284; 106585. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106585
18. Kuzmina L.Yu., Rumyantseva N.A. Microbiological Fertilizers and Their Effect on Yield. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Biologiya, ekologiya. 2019; 1: 45-50. DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2019-1-45-50 (In Rus.)
19. Liu Y. et al. The role of endophytic bacteria in improving soil quality and crop productivity. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2018; 84: 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.11.005
20. Kamenskikh M.V., Yagodkin A.V. Comparative Analysis of the Use of Biological and Chemical Fertilizers in Agriculture. Vestnik nauchnykh konferentsiy. 2018; 2(22): 77-81. (In Rus.)
21. Khan S., Mulvaney R., Hicks L., Niboyet A. A simpler method for estimating the contribution of nitrogen from the atmosphere to agricultural soils. Environmental Science & Technology. 2010; 44(21): 8191-8195. DOI: 10.1021/es1023255
22. Zhang X. et al. The use of biodegradable fertilizers to improve crop yield and quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2020; 293; 106862. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106862
23. Wang P., Lombi E. Nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture: Recent advances and future prospects. Environmental Science: Nano. 2019; № 6(6): 1735-1751. DOI: 10.1039/C9EN00343C
24. Gogos A., Knauer K., Bucheli T.D., Dobrowolski R. Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: Current state, foreseen applications, and research priorities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012; 60(39): 9781-9792. DOI: 10.1021/jf300964w
25. Kumar A. et al. Composting of organic waste: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24(19): 15235-15255. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9026-9
26. Mitrofanov S.V., Orlova N.V. Use of Biomodification of Fertilizers in order to Increase Sustainability of Crop Production. Agrokhimicheskiy vestnik. 2023; 1: 23-30. DOI: 10.24412/1029-2551-2023-1-004 (In Rus.)
27. Pandey R.K., Singh S.K., Kumar R., Kumar A. Biologically modified fertilizers: a review of innovative methods and technologies. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2017; 11: 438-445. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.07.043
28. Kumar A., Pandey R.K., Singh S.K. Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Sustainable Agriculture: A Perspective. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2015; 9 (1): 377-386. DOI: 10.22207/JPAM.9.SPL1.47
29. Hassanali A. et al. Integrated pest management: the push-pull approach for controlling insect pests of cereals, and its potential for other agricultural systems including animal husbandry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 2008; 363: 611-621. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2173
30. Lu Y.et al. Effects of integrated pest management (IPM) on cotton pests and their natural enemies in China. Crop Protection. 2018; 112: 11-18.
31. Köberl, Martina, et al. Exploring the plant-associated microbiome in oilseed rape-associations between bacterial communities, nutrient availability, and plant health. Frontiers in plant science. 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01189
32. Yang Bi-Jun et al. Plant extracts reduce pesticide use and increase crop yield in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019; 116(44): 22068-22073. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909865116
Review
For citations:
Mitrofanov S.V., Orlova N.V., Bogdanchikov I.Yu., Chaplygin M.E., Shevchuk A.A. Importance of agrochemical support in the transition to a sustainable farming model. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2023;(3):25-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2023-3-25-39