Preview

IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY

Advanced search

Floral sex ratios and anatomy of heterosexual plants in dioecious cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus l.) grown in Murmansk region

https://doi.org/10.34677/0021-342x-2019-6-130-140

Abstract

The author studied gender ratios in three populations of a valuable dioecious plant - cloudberry grown in Kandalaksha district of Murmansk region. The paper describes the microstructure of flowering shoots in female and male cloudberries with the purpose of revealing new features of sexual dimorphism. Male individuals predominated in all of the studied populations. The largest percentage of female individuals was found on a forest site, the smallest percentage - in a boggy forest near a stream. The highest density and, accordingly, the largest number of individuals per square meter were found on a hummock-ridge bog. The anatomical structure of axes, leaves and sepals is similar in male and female plants. The difference is in the absence of mechanical tissue in peduncles in male forms. This fact can be explained by their short life unlike the peduncles of female individuals that need to hold the fruit for a long time. The obtained results have been compared with the data provided in the reference sources.

About the Author

Svetlana Ye. Petrova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Валуйских О.Е., Тетерюк Л.В. Особенности структуры ценопопуляций Rubus chamaemorus L. в зонах тайги и тундры европейского северо-востока России // Изв. Самар. НЦ РАН. 2010. Т. 12. № 1 (3). С. 652-656.

2. Елина Г.А. Динамика урожайности ягод на болотах Карелии // Лесные растительные ресурсы Карелии. Петрозаводск, 1971. С. 34-41.

3. Елина Г.А. К методике картирования и учета ягодных ресурсов болот Карелии // Основные принципы изучения болотных биогеоценозов. Л., 1972. С. 70-89.

4. Елина Г.А. Использование аэрофотосъемки и тематических карт для оценки продуктивности болотных ягодников // Ресурсы ягодных и лекарственных растений и методы их изучения. Петрозаводск, 1975. С. 34-41.

5. Косицын В.Н. Морошка: биология, ресурсный потенциал, введение в культуру. М.: ВНИИЛМ, 2001. 140 с.

6. Юдина В. Ф., Максимова Т.А. Плодоношение Rubus chamaemorus L. на болоте-заказнике «Неназванное» (Южная Карелия) // Раст, ресурсы. 1997. Т. 33. Вып. 2. С. 40-44.

7. Agren J. Between-year variation in flowering and fruit set in frost-prone and frost-sheltered populations of dioecious Rubus chamaemorus // Oecologia. 1988. V. 76. P. 175-183.

8. Agren J., Elmqvist T., Tunlid A. Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. // Oecologia. 1986. V. 70. P. 332-338.

9. Barrett S.C.H., Hough J. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants // J. Exp. Bot. 2013. V. 64. P. 67-82.

10. Barret S.C.H., Thomson J.D. Spatial pattern, floral sex rations, and fecundity in dioecious Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae) // Can J. Bot. 1982. V. 60. P. 1662-1670.

11. Bussieres J., Rochefort L., Lapointe L. Cloudberry cultivation in cutover peatland: improved growth on less decomposed peat // Can. J. Plant Sci. 2015. V. 95. P. 479-489.

12. Dumas P., Maillette L. Rapport des sexes, effort et succe' s de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus, plante herbace' e vivace dioi" que de distribution subarctique // Can. J. Bot. 1987. V. 65. P. 2628-2639.

13. Field D.L., Pickup M., Spencer C.H. Barrett S.C.H. Ecological context and meta-population dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations // Ann Bot. 2013. V. 111. N5. P. 917-923.

14. Heilbuth J.C. Evolutionary consequences of dioecy in Angiosperms: the effects of breeding system on speciation and extinction rates. Thesis PhD, 2001. The Univercity of British Columbia. 2001. 110 p.

15. Karst A.L., Antos J.A., Allen G.A. Sex ratio, flowering and fruit set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus (Rosaceae) in Labrador // Botany. 2008. V. 86. N2. P. 204-212.

16. Korpelainen H. Sex ratios and resource allocation among sexually reproducing plants of Rubus chamaemorus // Ann. Bot. 1994. V. 74. P. 627-632.

17. Kortesharju J. Cloudberry yields and factors affecting the yield in Northern Finland // Acta Bot. Fenn. 1988. V. 136. P. 77-80.

18. Martinussen I., Rapp K., Bhuvaneswari T.V., Junttila O. Flower development in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) // ISHS Acta Horticulturae 585: VIII International Rubus and Ribes Symposium. 2002. P. 143-147.

19. Ostgard O. Investigations on cloudberries (Rubus chamaemorus) in North Norway // Forsk. Fors. Landbruket. 1964. V. 15. P. 409-440.

20. Stehlik I., Friedman J., Barrett S.C.H. Environmental influence on primary sex ratio in a dioecious plant // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008.V. 105. N10. P. 847-852.

21. Taylor K. Biological flora of the British isles. Rubus chamaemorus L. // List. Br. Vasc. Pl. 1958. N211, 1. 293-306.

22. Thiem B. Rubus chamaemorus L. - a boreal plant rich in biologically active metabolites: a review // Biol. Lett. 2003. Vol. 40. P. 3-13.


Review

For citations:


Petrova S.Ye. Floral sex ratios and anatomy of heterosexual plants in dioecious cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus l.) grown in Murmansk region. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2019;(6):130-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34677/0021-342x-2019-6-130-140

Views: 105


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0021-342X (Print)