Preview

IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY

Advanced search

Effect of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis strains on the microbiota and nutritional value of grass-legume silage

https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-6-174-191

Abstract

   Ensiling is a feed preservation process the quality of which is largely determined by microbiological processes. Under unfavorable harvesting conditions, high initial moisture content of the plant material, or non-compliance with technology, undesirable microorganisms such as enterobacteria, clostridia, and other species may proliferate instead of lactic acid bacteria. This proliferation degrades the nutritional value and quality of the finished feed.

   The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of new strains of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis, employed as biopreservatives, on the microbiota and nutritional value of grass-legume silage.

   The experiment evaluated the inoculation of ensiled biomass with Enterococcus faecium 46 and a combination of Enterococcus faecium 46 and Bacillus subtilis 18, in comparison to a control treatment without a preservative. Silage nutritional parameters and microbiota composition were determined on the 30th day of plant mass fermentation. The most favorable results regarding dry matter content, neutral detergent fiber, and the proportion of lactic acid in total organic acids were observed with the combined application of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis strains. Microbiota assessment via quantitative PCR in this experimental variant revealed the highest abundance of Lactobacillus species and a reduced count of Enterobacteriaceae family representatives, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., and Citrobacter sp. These findings suggest that the synergistic action of these strains during feed preservation effectively inhibited the development of putrefactive and pathogenic toxin-forming bacteria due to enhanced lactic acid synthesis. Based on these results, we conclude that this bacterial complex holds significant promise for improving fermentation and nutrient preservation in ensiled forages.

About the Authors

L. A. Ilina
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University; BIOTROF, OOO
Russian Federation

Larisa A. Ilina, DSc (Bio), Professor

Department of Large Livestock Breeding

196601; 2A Peterburgskoe Highway; 196602; 8A Malinovskaya St.; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



I. G. Malakhov
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Ivan G. Malakhov, postgraduate student

196601; 2A Peterburgskoe Highway; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



V. A. Zaikin
BIOTROF, OOO
Russian Federation

Vasily A. Zaikin, Biotechnologist

Molecular Genetics Laboratory

196602; 8A Malinovskaya St.; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



G. Yu. Laptev
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University; BIOTROF, OOO
Russian Federation

Georgy Yu. Laptev, DSc (Bio), Associate Professor, Professor at the Department, Director at the OOO

Department of Large Livestock Breeding

196601; 2A Peterburgskoe Highway; 196602; 8A Malinovskaya St.; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



V. Yu. Morozov
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Vitaly Yu. Morozov, DSc (Vet), Professor, Rector

196601; 2A Peterburgskoe Highway; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



S. P. Sklyarov
Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Sklyarov, CSc (Vet), Associate Professor, Director of the Institute

Institute of Animal Husbandry and Aquaculture named after V.I. Naumov

196601; 2A Peterburgskoe Highway; Saint Petersburg; Pushkin



References

1. Pakarinen P., Maijala S., Jaakkola F.L., Stoddard M. et al. Evaluation of Preservation Methods for Improving Biogas Production and Enzymatic Conversion Yields of Annual Crops. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2011;4:20. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-20

2. Dong Z.H., Li J.F., Wang S.R., Zhao J. et al. Gamma-ray Irradiation and Microbiota Transplantation to Separate the Effects of Chemical and Microbial Diurnal Variations on the Fermentation Characteristics and Bacterial Community of Napier Grass Silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2022;102:4322-4332. doi: 10.1002/JSFA.11784

3. Xu Z.S., He H.Y., Zhang S.S., Kong J. Effects of Inoculants Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus parafarraginis on the Fermentation Characteristics and Microbial Communities of Corn Stover Silage. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:13614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14052-1

4. Pedroso A.F., Adesogan A.T., Queiroz O.C., Williams S.K. Control of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in Corn Silage with or Without Various Inoculants: Efficacy and Mode of Action. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010;93(3):1098-1104. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2433

5. Driehuis F., Wilkinson J.M., Jiang Y. Silage review: Animal and Human Health Risks from Silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101(5):4093-4110. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13836

6. Ogunade M., Jiang Y., Kim D.H., Cervantes A.A.P. et al. Fate of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Bacterial Diversity in Corn Silage Contaminated with the Pathogen and Treated with Chemical or Microbial Additives. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;100:1780-1794. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11745

7. Russell J.B., Diez-Gonzalez F., Jarvis G.N. Potential Effects of Cattle Diets on the Transmission of Pathogenic Escherichia coli to Humans. Microbes and Infection. 2000;2(10717540):45-53. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00286-0

8. Chapman P.A., Siddons C.A., Cerdan Malo A.T., Harkin M.A.A. 1-year Study of Escherichia coli O157 in Cattle, Sheep, Pigs and Poultry. Epidemiology and Infection. 1997;119(9363024):245-250. doi: 10.1017/s0950268897007826

9. Queiroz O.C.M., Ogunade I.M., Weinberg Z., Adesogan A.T. Silage Review: Foodborne Pathogens in Silage and Their Mitigation by Silage Additives. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:4132-4142. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13901

10. Vissers M.M., Driehuis F., Te Giffel M.C., De Jong P. et al. Short communication: Quantification of the Transmission of Microorganisms to Milk via Dirt Attached to the Exterior of Teats. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;90(8):3579-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-633

11. Pahlow G., Muck R.E., Driehuis F., Elferink S.J.W.H.O. et al. Microbiology of Ensiling. In: Silage science and technology. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Inc., 2003.

12. Hu W., Schmidt R.J., McDonell E.E., Klingerman C.M. The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1 on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silages Ensiled at Two Dry Matter Contents. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92:3907-3914. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1788

13. Kosolapov V.M., Chuikov V.A., Khudyakova Kh.K., Kosolapova V.G. Physicochemical methods of feed analysis. Moscow, Russia: Tipografiya Rosselkhozakademii, 2014:344. (In Russ.)

14. Ávila C.L.S., Carvalho B.F. Silage Fermentation-updates Focusing on the Performance of Microorganisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2020;128(4):966-984. doi: 10.1111/jam.14450

15. Borreani G., Tabacco E., Schmidt R.J., Holmes B.J. et al. Silage Review: Factors Affecting Dry Matter and Quality Losses in Silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:3952-3979. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13837

16. Zhang Y.C., Li D.X., Wang X.K., Lin Y.L. et al. Fermentation Dynamics and Diversity of Bacterial Community in Four Typical Woody Forages. Annals of Microbiology. 2019;69:233-240. doi: 10.1007/s13213-018-1398-z

17. Huhtanen P., Rinne M., Nousiainen J. Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Silage Intake of Dairy Cows; A Revision of the Relative Silage Dry Matter Intake Index. Animal. 2007;1:758-770. doi: 10.1017/S175173110773673X

18. Fustini M., Palmonari A., Canestrari G., Bonfante E. et al. Effect of Undigested Neutral Detergent Fiber Content of Alfalfa Hay on Lactating Dairy Cows: Feeding Behavior, Fiber Digestibility, and Lactation Performance. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;100:4475-4483. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12266

19. Miller M.D., Kokko C., Ballard C.S., Dann H.M. et al. Influence of Fiber Degradability of Corn Silage in Diets with Lower and Higher Fiber Content on Lactational Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Ruminal Characteristics in Lactating Holstein Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2021;104:1728-1743. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19088

20. Li L., Sun Y., Yuan Z. Effect of Microalgae Supplementation on the Silage Quality and Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Manyflower Silvergrass. Bioresource Technology. 2015;189:334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.029

21. Li M., Zi X., Zhou H., Hou G. et al. Effects of Sucrose, Glucose, Molasses and Cellulase on Fermentation Quality and in Vitro Gas Production of King Grass Silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2014;197:206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.016

22. Yan Y.H., Li X.M., Guan H., Huang L.K. Microbial Community and Fermentation Characteristic of Italian Ryegrass Silage Prepared with Corn Stover and Lactic Acid Bacteria. Bioresource Technology. 2019;279:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107

23. Guo T.T., Zhang L., Xin Y.P., Xu Z.S. et al. Oxygen-inducible Conversion of Lactate to Acetate in Heterofermentative Lactobacillus brevis ATCC367. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2017;83: e01659-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01659-17

24. Cai Y.M., Benno Y., Ogawa M., Ohmomo S. et al. Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an Inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from Forage Crops on Silage Fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64:2982-2987. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.8.2982-2987.1998

25. Ni K.K., Zhao J.Y., Zhu B.G., Su R.N. et al. Assessing the Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of the Mixed Silage of Forage Soybean with CROP Corn or Sorghum. Bioresource Technology. 2018;265:563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097

26. Grill J.P., Crociani J., Ballongue J. Characterization of Fructose 6 phosphate Phosphoketolases Purified from Bifidobacterium Species. Current Microbiology. 1995;31:49-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00294634

27. Ogunade M. Silage Review: Mycotoxins in silage: Occurrence, Effects, Prevention, and Mitigation. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101(5):4034-4059. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13788

28. Lindgren Ö.S. Influences of Enterobacteria on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Grass Silages. Grass and Forage Science. 1995;50:41-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02292.x

29. Fuhs G.W., Chen M. Microbiological Basis of Phosphate Removal in the Activated Sludge Process for the Treatment of Wastewater. Microbial Ecology. 1975;2:119-138. doi: 10.1007/BF02010434

30. Bai C., Wang L., Sun H., Xu Y. et al. Dynamics of Bacterial and Fungal Communities and Metabolites During Aerobic Exposure in Whole-plant Corn Silages with Two Different Moisture Levels. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:663895. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.663895

31. Keshri J., Chen Y., Pinto R., Kroupitski Y. et al. Microbiome Dynamics During Ensiling of Corn With and Without Lactobacillus plantarum Inoculant. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102:4025-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8903-y

32. Liu B., Huan H., Gu H., Xu N. et al. Dynamics of a Microbial Community During Ensiling and Upon Aerobic Exposure in Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculation-treated and Untreated Barley Silages. Bioresource Technology. 2019;273:212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.041

33. Yue Z.B., Chen R., Yang F., James M. et al. Effects of Dairy Manure and Corn Stover Co-digestion on Anaerobic Microbes and Corresponding Digestion Performance. Bioresource Technology. 2013;128:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.115

34. Li Y., Nishino N. Effects of Inoculation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus buchneri on Fermentation, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities in Whole Crop Corn Silage. Grass and Forage Science. 2011;57:184-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-697X.2011.00226.x


Review

For citations:


Ilina L.A., Malakhov I.G., Zaikin V.A., Laptev G.Yu., Morozov V.Yu., Sklyarov S.P. Effect of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis strains on the microbiota and nutritional value of grass-legume silage. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2025;(6):174-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-6-174-191

Views: 55

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0021-342X (Print)