Effect of auxins on the callusogenesis in microclones of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.
https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2026-2-45-56
Abstract
Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. are relict giant plants whose reproductive vulnerability cannot be challenged. Currently, the depletion of natural populations and the risk of plant extinction are acute issues. Therefore, biotechnological methods for creating in vitro genetic banks and bioresource collections are becoming particularly relevant. Such technologies include clonal micropropagation, which allows obtaining genetically stable, “healthy” planting material with a high reproduction rate. Extractive substances from Sequoia sempervirens tissues exhibit high biological activity. Aseptic in vitro cultures also retain the ability to biosynthesize substances with high biological activity. It is known that in vitro gymnosperms cultures are challenging to initiate and exhibit slow growth rates. Therefore, the study aimed at overcoming these methodological barriers is of particular importance. This study presents a method for obtaining callus tissue from the loewr apex of S. sempervirens microclones cultivated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) nutrient medium supplemented with various auxins (2,4-D, IAA, IBA, and NAA) at a concentration of 3 mg/L. The nutrient medium variant with NAA showed the earliest activation of the dedifferentiation process. In contrast, callus cultivated on the medium with IAA exhibited a low growth rate and developed a dark brown colouration.
About the Authors
S. M. ZaytsevaRussian Federation
Svetlana M. Zaytseva, CSc (Bio), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Biotechnology
49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127434
R. N. Kirakosyan
Russian Federation
Rima N. Kirakosyan, CSc (Bio), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Biotechnology
49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127434
E. A. Bolotina
Russian Federation
Elizaveta A. Bolotina, postgraduate student of the Department of Biotechnology
49 Timiryazevskaya St., Moscow, 127434
References
1. Disney M., Burt A., Wilkes P., Armston J. et al. New 3D measurements of large redwood trees for biomass and structure. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):16721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73733-6
2. Pereira M. de O., Angelo A.C., Navroski M.C., Dobner M. et al. Vegetative rescue and rooting of cuttings of different stock plants of Sequoia sempervirens. Cerne. 2017;23:435-444. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723042452
3. Sillett S.C., Antoine M.E., Carroll A.L., Graham M.E. et al. Rangewide climatic sensitivities and non-timber values of tall Sequoia sempervirens forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;526:120573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120573
4. Nydick K.R., Stephenson N.L., Ambrose A.R., Asner G.P. et al. Leaf to landscape responses of giant sequoia to hotter drought: An introduction and synthesis for the special section. Forest Ecology and Management. 2018;419:249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.028
5. Vargas A.R., Castander-Olarieta A., Moncalean P., Montalban I.A. Optimization of the micropropagation of elite adult trees of Sequoia sempervirens: forest species of interest in the Basque Country, Spain. Revista Bionatura. 2021;6(1):1511-1519. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2021.06.01.11
6. Kirakosyan R.N., Kalasnikova E.A., Bolotina E.A., Saleh A. et al. Localization of Secondary Metabolites in Relict Gymnosperms of the Genus Sequoia In Vivo and in Cell Cultures In Vitro, and the Biological Activity of Their Extracts. Reproductive and Developmental Biology. 2024;14(12):1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121694
7. Zhang Y.M., Tan N.H., He M., Lu Y. et al. Sequosempervirin A, a novel spirocyclic compound from Sequoia sempervirens. Tetrahedron Letters. 2004;45(22):4319-4321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.04.038
8. Hatam N.A.R., Whiting D.A. The constituents of Californian redwood: the constitution, absolute stereochemistry, and chemistry of sequirin-B and sequirin-C. Journal of the Chemical Society C: Organic. 1969;14:1921-1932. https://doi.org/10.1039/J39690001921
9. Tretyakova I.N., Voroshilova E.V., Shuvaev D.N., Lukina A.S. Formation of callus and induction of somatic embryos in vitro culture in Pinus sibirica Du Tour. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Biology. 2013;6(1):44-60. (In Russ.)
10. Ahmad M.A., Javed R., Adeel M., Rizwan M. et al. Engineered ZnO and CuO nanoparticles ameliorate morphological and biochemical response in tissue culture regenerants of candyleaf (Stevia rebaudiana). Molecule. 2020;25(6):1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061356
11. Pereira M.O., Angelo A.C., Navroski M.C., de Oliveira L.M. et al. Mini-cuttings rooting of Sequoia sempervirens at different IBA concentrations and clones. FLORESTA, Curitiba, PR. 2020;50(2):1279-1286. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v50i2.62579
12. Laslo V., Agud E.M., Vicas S. In vitro modeling of morfogenesys processes in Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl, via the use of phytohormones. Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. 2015:73-78. https://doi.org/10.5555/20163167398
13. El-Hawary S.S., Abd El-Kader E.M., Rabeh M.A., Abdel Jaleel G.A. et al. Eliciting callus culture for production of hepatoprotective flavonoids and phenolics from Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don Endl). Natural Product Research. 2020;34(21):3125-3129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1607334
14. Neale D.B., Marshall K.A., Sederoff R.R. Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA are paternally inherited in Sequoia sempervirens D. Don Endl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1989;86(23):9347-9349. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.23.934
15. Zaitseva S.M., Kalashnikova E.A., Kirakosyan R.N. The influence of endogenous polyphenols, photoperiod and mineral composition of the nutrient medium on the formation of callus tissue of relic gymnosperms Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. Problems of Biological Medical and Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 2023;26(3):46-57. https://doi.org/10.29296/25877313-2023-03-06
16. Bourgkard F., Favre J.M. Somatic Embryos from Callus of Sequoia Sempervirens. Plant Cell Reports. 1988;7(6):445-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269534
17. Cetin E.S. Induction of secondary metabolite production by UV-C radiation in Vitis vinifera L. Okuzgozu callus cultures. Biological Research. 2014;47(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-37
18. Tomilova S.V., Globa E.B., Demidova E.V., Nosov A.M. Secondary metabolism in Тaxus spp. plant cell culture in vitro. Fiziologiya rastenij. 2023;70():227-240. (In Russ.) 3https://doi.org/10.31857/S0015330322600784
19. Zaitseva S.М., Kalashnikova Е.А., Kirakosyan R.N., Balakina А.А. In vitro cell cultures of Ginkgo biloba L., introduced in the Moscow region are promising sources of substances with high biological activity. Problems of Biological Medical and Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 2024;27(10):67-78. https://doi:10.29296/25877313-2024-10-10
20. Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum. 1962;15(3):473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
21. Patent 2815450 (Russian Federation): IPC A01H 4/00, SPC A01H 4/00. Method for clonal micropropagation of evergreen sequoia (Sequoia sempervirens L.). Zaitseva S.M., Kalashnikova E.A., Kirakosyan R.N., Bolotina E.A., 2023. (In Russ.)
22. Urbach V.Yu. Statistical analysis in biological and medical research. Moscow, USSR: Meditsina, 1975:297. (In Russ.)
23. Nosov A.M. Application of cell technologies for production of plant-derived bioactive substances of plant origin. Biotekhnologiya. 2010;(5):8-28. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Zaytseva S.M., Kirakosyan R.N., Bolotina E.A. Effect of auxins on the callusogenesis in microclones of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2026;(2):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2026-2-45-56
JATS XML








