Seed productivity of Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. & Kit. during cultivation at All-Russian Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-5-34-48
Abstract
Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. & Kit. is a valuable ornamental perennial herbaceous species, highly sought after for shade gardens and exhibiting potential for medicinal applications. While this species has been successfully introduced into various botanical gardens in European Russia, the potential for seed propagation remains understudied. This study aims to identify the developmental features and study the characteristics of seed propagation of H. purpurascens under the conditions of the Central Non-Chernozem region, using Moscow as a case study. H. purpurascens has been cultivated in the VILAR collection since 2006. During the years 2024–2025, the timing of phenological phases up to fruit dehiscence, structural features of dicyclic shoots, and elements of seed productivity were investigated. The number of leaves, generative shoots, and fruits on them was recorded for 15 plants, while the number of carpels per fruit, seeds per carpel, and leaflet parameters were assessed for 40 fruits. The results indicated that the onset of flowering in H. purpurascens occurs in late March to early April, coinciding with residual snow cover and the total heat reaching 125–135°C. Monitoring the condition of carpels at the onset of dehiscence is recommended from mid-June when planning seed collection for this helleborus species to prevent seed loss. A strong positive correlation was found between the number of assimilating leaves of the median formation and the number of generative shoots in H. purpurascens*; the number of leaves exceeded the number of generative shoots in the plants by a factor of 1.24–2.0. Each fruit contained between 4 and 9 carpels. No significant differences were observed in the average number of seeds developing in one leaflet across the study years. Consistent fruit production enables the creation of seed stocks, with the potential for harvesting an estimated 37 to 133 seeds per generative shoot, depending on the number of flowers it bears.
About the Authors
O. A. SorokopudovaRussian Federation
Olga A. Sorokopudova, DSc (Bio), Professor, Head of the Department of Plant Resources
7 Grina St., Moscow, 117218
E. I. Khanumidi
Russian Federation
Elizaveta I. Khanumidi, CSc (Agr), Leading Research Associate at the Department of Plant Resources
7 Grina St., Moscow, 117218
References
1. Kosheleva E.D., Orlova E.E. Variety study of Calendula officinalis L. in Moscow. Bulletin of Landscape Architecture. 2021;25:37-41. (In Russ.)
2. Kosheleva E.D., Orlova E.E. The influence of growing conditions on the manifestation of ornamental features of Calendula officinalis L. in Moscow. Bulletin of Landscape Architecture. 2022;29:36-41. (In Russ.)
3. Zubik I.N., Taganova A.D., Makarov S.S. et al. Reproduction of representatives of the genus Elaeagnus by green cuttings in the conditions of Moscow. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2023;5:36-42. (In Russ.)
4. Makarov P.N., Makarov S.S., Chudetsky A.I., Zaitsev A.L. Biological features of growth and development of plants of the genus Monarda L. in closed and open ground conditions: a monograph. Moscow, Russua: Kolos-s. 2023:74. (In Russ.)
5. Makarov S.S., Zubik I.N., Orlova E.E. et al. Study of ornamental features of feijoa (Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret) in Abkhazia. Fruit and Berry Growing in Russia. 2023;75:61-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2023-75-61-77
6. Makarov S.S., Kazieva A.Yu., Makarova T.A., Samoylenko Z.A. et al. Microclonal reproduction of shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosa (L.) Rydb.) with elements of hydroponics. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023;(2(100)):64-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2023-100-2-64-71
7. Makarov S.S., Makarova T.A., Berdysheva E.A. Methods for obtaining plant materials of Sanguisorba officinalis L. in the conditions of the taiga zone of Western Siberia: a monograph. Moscow, Russia: Kolos-s. 2023:72. (In Russ.)
8. Makarov S.S., Makarova T.A., Samoylenko Z.A., Makarov P.N. et al. Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.) in vitro and ex vitro propagation features. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023;(3(101)):77-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2023-101-3-77-83
9. Cheryatova Yu.S. Biodiversity of medicinal plants as the central component of health of the planet. Biosfernoe khozyaystvo: teoriya i praktika. 2023;(9(62)):58-62. (In Russ.)
10. Zarubina L.V., Surov V.V., Kulikova E.I., Chudetskiy A.I. et al. Adaptability of some ex vitro-adapted medicinal plants to the soil and climatic conditions of the Vologda region. Izvestiya of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 202(4);2:33-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2024-2-33-44
11. Makarov P.N., Makarov S.S., Makarova T.A., Samoylenko Z.A. et al. Microclonal reproduction of Digitalis purpurea L. And adaptation of regenerants in hydroponics. Izvestiya of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2024;(4):53-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2024-4-53-69
12. Makarov S.S., Berdysheva E.A., Makarova T.A., Makarov P.N. et al. Resource assessment of the cenopopulations of Sanguisorba officinalis L. in the Surgut District of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra. Izvestiya of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2025;(2):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-2-57-71
13. Makarov S.S., Bagayev E.S., Tsaregradskaya S.Yu., Kuznetsova I.B. Problems of use and reproduction of phytogenic food and medicinal forest resources on the forest fund lands of the Kostroma Region. Russian Forestry Journal. 2019;(6):118-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2019-6-118
14. Makarov S.S., Chudetsky А.I., Sakhonenko А.N., Solovyov А.V. et al. Creation of a bioresource collection of berry plants on the basis of Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. Timiryazev Biological Journal. 2023;(4):23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2949-4710-2023-4-23-33
15. Cheryatova Yu.S. On the problem of protection and reproduction of rare medicinal plant resources. Biosfernoe khozyaystvo: teoriya i praktika. 2024;(3(68)):46-50. (In Russ.)
16. Cheryatova Yu.S., Chudetsky A.I., Kulikova E.I., Surov V.V. Primary introductory study of neglected sweetvetch (Hedysarum neglectum Ledeb.) in the conditions of the Vologda Region, Russia. Izvestiya of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2025;(1):77-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-1-77-92
17. Taxon: Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. & Kit. GRIN-Global. 2021. URL: https://genebank.ilri.org/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomydetail?id=467724 (accessed: April 11, 2025).
18. Korovkin O.A., Cheryatova Yu.S. Botany: a textbook. Moscow, Russia: KnoRus, 2024:464. (In Russ.)
19. Long L., Yamada K., Ochiai M. A comprehensive review of the morphological and molecular taxonomy of the genus Helleborus (Ranunculaceae). Reviews in Agricultural Science. 2023;11:106-120. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.11.0_106
20. Kušen M., Židovec V., Prebeg T. Ornamental characteristics, assortment and winter flowering hellebores (Helleborus spp.) cultivation. Glasnik Zaštite Bilja. 2021; 44(6):4-12. https://doi.org/10.31727/gzb.44.6.1
21. Melnyk V.I. Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. et Kit. (Ranunculaceae) is rare species of European flora in eastern limit of area. Plant introduction. 2015;(3):17-24. (In Ukr.) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2526992
22. Zhigunov O.Yu., Anishchenko I.E. Introduction of some species of Helleborus L. under the conditions of the Bashkir Cis-Urals. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2018;(4):55-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31040/2222-8349-2018-0-4-55-59
23. Gontar O.B., Trostenyuk N.N., Svyatkovskaia E.A., Zhirov V.K. Introduction of rare protected species of woody and herbaceous plants and their use in landscaping urban areas in the Kola North. Botanicheskie issledovaniia na Urale. November 10-12, 2009. Perm, Russia: Perm State University, 2009:84-90. (In Russ.)
24. Franz M.H., Birzoi R., Maftei C.-V., Maftei E. et al. Studies on the constituents of Helleborus purpurascens: analysis and biological activity of the aqueous and organic extracts. Amino Acids. 2018;50(1):163-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2502-6
25. Balázs V.L., Filep R., Ambrus T., Kocsis M. et al. Ethnobotanical, historical and histological evaluation of Helleborus L. genetic resources used in veterinary and human ethnomedicine. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2020;67(3):781-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00876-5
26. Maior M., Dobrotă C. Natural compounds with important medical potential found in Helleborus sp. Open Life Sciences. 2013;8(3):272-285. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0129-x
27. Pilut C.N., Manea A., Macasoi I., Dobrescu A. et al. Comparative evaluation of the potential antitumor of Helleborus purpurascens in skin and breast cancer. Plants. 2022;11(2):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020194
28. Grigore A., Bubueanu C., Pirvu L., Neagu G. et al. Immunomodulatory effect of Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. & Kit. Plants. 2021;10(10):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10101990
29. Borozan A.B., Popescu S., Moldovan C., Sărac I. et al. Helleborus – phytochemistry and antimicrobial properties. A review. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 2022;26(2):69-75. https://journal-hfb.usab-tm.ro/2022/JHFB_2022_Vol_II/10Borozan_Aurica_Breica%20et%20al.pdf
30. Tsaturyan G.A., Malyarovskaya V.I. Historical and systematic review of Helleborus L. representatives and their bio-morphological and pharmacological features. Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo. 2024;(89):123-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31360/2225-3068-2024-89-123-140
31. Li S., Chen X., Tang J., Zhang D. et al. Genus Helleborus: a comprehensive review of phytochemistry, pharmacology and clinical applications. Natural Product Research. 2025;39(4):888-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2024.231788
32. Gabryszewska E. Propagation in vitro of hellebores (Helleborus L.) review. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus. 2017;16(1):61-72.
33. Boyko I., Didenko I., Usoltseva O., Ponomarenko V. et al. Biomorphological features of Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. et Kit. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation. 2024;2(15):51-59. (In Ukr.) https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya15(2).2024.005
34. Meiners J., Winkelmann T. Evaluation of reproductive barriers and realisation of interspecific hybridisations depending on genetic distances between species in the genus Helleborus. Plant Biology. 2012;14(4):576-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00542.x
35. Belousova N.L., Borodich G.S., Gaishun V.V., Zavadskaia L.V. et al. Rare and endangered species of Eurasian flora in the collections of the Central Botanical Garden of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Novosti nauki v APK. 2019;(1-1(12)):17-2 2. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25930/8bkc-sp56
36. Voronina O.E., Senator S.A., Shaikina M.N. Collection fund of the exposition “Wild-Growing Useful Plants” of the Department of Natural Flora of the Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the RAS. Phytodiversity of Eastern Europe. 2024;18(4):33-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8816-2024-18-4-33-57
37. Fatyunina Iu.A., Mozhaeva G.F., Kagina N.A. Rapid test of the successful introduction of herbal and semi-wood medicinal plants of Penza Botanical Garden of Penza State University. University Proceedings. Volga Region. Natural Sciences. 2022;(3(39)):28-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21685/2307-9150-2022-3-3
38. Isayenko T.N. Species of the genus Helleborus L. in the expositions of the Stavropol Botanical Garden. Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Region. 2019;(3(35)):57-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31279/2222-9345-2019-8-35-57-60
39. Zagumennikova T.N. Biological characteristics of some rare and endangered species of the Buttercup family when grown in the Moscow Region. Novye i netraditsionnye rasteniia i perspektivy ikh ispolzovaniia. 2018;(13):46-48. (In Russ.)
40. Zhemukhova M.M., Chadaeva V.A., Shkhagapsoev S.Kh. Reproductive biology of Helleborus caucasicus (Ranunculaceae) in nature and introduction. Rastitelnye Resursy. 2019;55(1):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0033994619010151
41. Fedorova E.A. Representatives of the Ranunculaceae family in the collection of the Western European flora region of the VILAR Botanical Garden. Sedmaya nauchnaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem ‘Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya tekhnologii zdorov’esberezheniya’. December 17, 2019. Moscow, Russia All-Russian Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: 2019;12:118-124. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Sorokopudova O.A., Khanumidi E.I. Seed productivity of Helleborus purpurascens Waldst. & Kit. during cultivation at All-Russian Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. IZVESTIYA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY. 2025;1(5):34-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-5-34-48













